Overview

Wiley’s Patent Practice has built a 30-year record of obtaining successful outcomes for clients from a wide array of industries. We have considerable experience in representing both accused infringers and, in certain circumstances, patent holders in high-profile and high-stakes patent disputes. Our full-service Practice provides patent litigation, prosecution, and strategic counseling on IP licensing, due diligence, and portfolio development and valuation.

Wiley advises clients from a diverse range of high-tech industries, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, and consumer electronics. Both domestic and international clients have said that they choose Wiley for our ability as a Washington, DC law firm to uniquely combine our knowledge of the U.S. court system with the legal and political landscape. As a DC-based firm, our experience and capabilities in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are top-notch. However, our practice is national, and we have extensive experience in every district court in the United States known for patent litigationincluding courts in Texas, Delaware, California, Florida, New York, and New Jersey.

Many of our attorneys clerked for judges in district courts or the Federal Circuit. All of our patent litigators hold engineering or science degrees, including many advanced degrees.

Our Approach

We are trial lawyers and counselors specializing in patent cases. Our approach is to prepare a case with the expectation that it will go to trial while also pursuing more efficient avenues to resolve the case, including strategic motions practice, the use of mediation or arbitration, and PTAB proceedings.

Our intensive preparation and dedication to staffing matters leanly and efficiently allows us to provide cost-effective representation to our clients. Unlike some of our highly leveraged peer firms, we staff cases with a small team of experienced attorneys who are fully immersed in the facts. With the full resources of our large firm behind us, we can increase staffing as needed, but the core team will handle the issues that we believe to be dispositive. This lean staffing model allows us to provide cost-effective representation to clients ranging from Fortune 500 corporations and segment-leading companies to startup and midcap venturesusually at overall rates that are far more competitive than those of our peer firms.

Selected Experience

A sample of significant representations includes: 

Technology/Software

  • Obtaining summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity on behalf of client Openet Telecom in the Eastern District of Virginia in which competitor and software giant Amdocs alleged that Openet’s products infringed four Amdocs patents.
  • Representing a large nationwide telecommunications carrier in numerous multi-defendant patent infringement actions in the Eastern District of Texas, Northern District of California, District of Delaware, and Eastern District of Virginia in lawsuits pertaining to text messaging, wireless modems, and other cellular phone features. Notable cases include obtaining a jury verdict patent invalidity and non-infringement in the Eastern District of Virginia in a case in which the plaintiff sought $140 million in damages.
  • Representing ARM in numerous lawsuits where its customers have been sued for using ARM processor cores in their chipsets. Includes, for example, a victory in the Eastern District of Texas and affirmed by the Federal Circuit.
  • Representing TomTom in numerous infringement lawsuits filed by non-practicing entities in courts across the country, including in the Northern District of Illinois, District of Delaware, Eastern District of Virginia, District of Nevada, and Eastern District of Texas. In one notable case, we obtained summary judgment of invalidity against a widely licensed patent involving touchscreen keyboards.
  • Securing a victory for Atico International USA, Inc., and Target Corporation in defense of claims of patent infringement pertaining to digital picture frames filed by Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc. (DSSI) in the Central District of California. The court construed the claims of the asserted patent and simultaneously granted Atico’s motion for summary judgment of no literal infringement and no infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
  • Securing, on behalf of patent holder NTP Inc., a $612.5 million patent infringement settlement with Research In Motion Limited (RIM), the maker of BlackBerry wireless email devices. The settlement, one of the largest ever of its kind, resolved a fiercely contested, high-profile patent case stemming from a 2002 jury trial in which the firm successfully argued that RIM’s core BlackBerry line of wireless email products, software, and services willfully infringed NTP patents.
  • Representing multiple financial institutions in patent infringement actions involving electronic imaging, transmission, and presentation of financial documents, bankcard processing systems, encrypting financial transactions, and other Internet and business methods.
  • Securing a victory in the District of New Jersey for Molson Coors Brewing Company (MCBC) in defense of claims of patent infringement pertaining to computer-implemented methods and systems for investors to obtain mutual funds in a foreign currency by swapping rights with a willing co-investor in another country.

Pharmaceuticals

In the pharmaceutical patent infringement and Hatch-Waxman context, we have been involved in litigations concerning the following products:

  • Acetaminophen IV (Ofirmev®)
  • Allopurinol (Zyloprim®)
  • Aripiprazole (Abilify®)
  • Bendamustine (Treanda®)
  • Bortezomib (Velcade®)
  • Carbidopa/Levodopa (Sinemet® CR)
  • Cetuximab (Erbitux®)
  • Cyclobenzaprine HCl (Amrix®)
  • Dextromethorphan/Quinidine (Nuedexta®)
  • Doxycycline Hyclate (Doryx®)
  • Dutasteride (Avodart®)
  • Erlotinib (Tarceva®)
  • Fenofibrate (Antara®)
  • Fesoterodine (Toviaz®)
  • Gabapentin (Gralise®)
  • Interferon (Roferon®-A)
  • Levofloxacin (Levaquin®)
  • Loratadine (Claritin®)
  • Micronized Glyburide (Glynase®)
  • Omeprazole (Prilosec®)
  • Oxybutynin Chloride (Ditropan XL®)
  • Romidepsin (Istodax®)
  • Tamoxifen Citrate (Nolvadex®)
  • Tolterodine Tartate (Detrol® LA)
  • tPA (Activase®)

Representative successes include:

  • Securing a victory at trial for clients Mylan and Esteve in their defense of a protracted patent infringement litigation brought by AstraZeneca in the Southern District of New York concerning Mylan/Esteve’s generic omeprazole product equivalent to Astra’s Prilosec® product.
  • Representation of Impax Pharmaceuticals in the District of New Jersey in Warner Chilcott v. Impax, where the district court decided that the patent-in-suit was not infringed by Impax’s generic Doryx product and the Federal Circuit summarily affirmed in 2012.
  • Securing a victory at trial and subsequent appeal in Alza v. Mylan, a rare obviousness invalidation of a patent protecting the blockbuster drug oxybutynin chloride (Ditropan XL®) in a matter that the Federal Circuit used as a template for explaining its obviousness law.
  • Representing a major U.S. biopharmaceutical company in patent actions before the District of Massachusetts and Federal Circuit involving a major cancer treatment drug.
  • Schering Corp. v. Zenith Goldline Pharms. Inc.: Successfully represented Zenith Goldline in an infringement action brought by Schering in the District of New Jersey. This was a multi-defendant consolidated case involving the antihistamine drug Claritin® (loratadine). Wiley, in cooperation with co-defendants, obtained summary judgment of invalidity for Zenith, which was affirmed on appeal.

Licensing, Due Diligence and Intellectual Property Valuation

The firm assists clients in the licensing, sale, and purchase of patents and technology related thereto. Also, in connection with clients’ purchase of assets, the firm evaluates the intellectual property portfolio, including the validity of the patents being acquired, whether or not others are currently infringing the technology, and the clients’ vulnerability to others’ patented technology, and analyzes potential litigation outcomes.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), formed in 2012 as a part of the America Invents Act, decides important issues of patentability. The PTAB provides several ways to contest patents, including inter partes reviews (IPRs), post-grant reviews (PGRs), covered business method reviews (CBMs) and derivation proceedings.

These proceedings give parties cost-effective methods of challenging an issued patent based on prior art patents and printed publications. These are intended to be a less expensive and faster option for post-grant patent challenges, with initial determinations within six months of filing and a final decision within 12 months.

Wiley attorneys and advisors work with clients on a comprehensive patent strategy that spans from inception to well beyond grant. Our attorneys have been deeply involved in the PTAB and previously the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) and have assisted clients in numerous IPRs, PGRs, and CBMs, and have one of the best-known teams available to assist clients in future PTAB matters. 

Additionally, we have experience filing requests for ex parte reexamination. These proceedings can be a valuable strategic tool, allowing companies to challenge competitors patents with relative anonymity and without risk of estoppel that accompanies inter partes proceedings. Patent owners contemplating litigation or licensing may also use ex parte reexamination as a tool to refine claims and avoid prior art.   

IPR Experience

Since the introduction of IPRs in 2012, Wiley has assisted with more than 30 IPR proceedings, involving telecommunications hardware and software, semiconductors and microprocessors, and pharmaceutical formulations and compounds. Our experience includes advising clients on IPR strategies as part of our comprehensive, business-focused patent strategy.

Our representative IPR experience includes:

  • Assisted a major U.S. financial institution in preparing and filing IPR petitions related to data security patents used in connection with online banking.
  • Assisted a major U.S. corporation in preparing and filing IPR petitions related to wireless cell phone technologies.
  • Assisted our client in preparing and filing IPR petitions related to virtual memory for a processor.
  • Assisted our client and co-counsel in preparing and filing IPR petitions related to LED lighting technologies.

CBM Reviews

Our representative CBM experience includes:

  • Drafted and filed, on behalf of a major U.S. bank, the first-ever CBM review filed at the PTAB by a financial institution. The PTAB found the patent-at-issue unpatentable.
  • Assisted a major U.S. financial institution in preparing and filing CBM petitions related to data security patents used in connection with online banking.

Patent Prosecution

The firm files and prosecutes patent applications in the United States and around the world. Our Patent attorneys have working experience in a wide variety of high-tech industries, including electrical, chemical, biotechnology, pharmaceutical, software, bioinformatics, Internet, and mechanical, as well as e-commerce and other business methodologies. 

International Trade Commission Section 337 Proceedings

Our attorneys are experienced in representing clients in patent infringement proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) under Section 337 of the Tariff Act, which is designed to prevent the entry of infringing goods into the United States and to provide a resolution on an expedited scheduletypically within 12 months. We regularly serve clients in these specialized proceedings by successfully combining our expertise in international trade, intellectual property, and other fields, becoming especially active in bringing 337 actions against parties engaged in selling infringing pharmaceuticals over the Internet. Among our additional successes was a prominent victory in a case involving novel microwave filters on satellites that, based upon their light weight, enabled increased satellite life.

The firm’s capabilities in representing clients during these accelerated proceedings are extensive and widely recognized, with John R. Shane being rated as a “Leading Lawyer” by Chambers USA.

In this arena, we have:

  • Represented Lilly ICOS LLC as a complainant in an investigation involving Cialis® (In the Matter of Certain Tadalafil of Salts and Solvates Thereof, and Products Containing Same). Our firm obtained a general exclusion order against infringing importation of the chemical in Cialis®.
  • Represented Pfizer Inc. as a complainant in an investigation involving Viagra® (In re Matter of Sildenafil or any Pharmaceutically Acceptable Salt thereof, and Products Containing Same). Our firm obtained a general exclusion order prohibiting all infringing imports, regardless of source, the most favorable outcome possible for a complainant in a Section 337 investigation.
  • Represented Atico International USA, Inc., as a respondent, in an investigation involving batteries (In re Matter of Certain Zero-Mercury Added Alkaline Batteries). The case was favorably settled before trial.
  • Represented Space Systems/Loral in a patent infringement action before the USITC and obtained the equivalent of a preliminary injunction against Com Dev involving novel dual-mode dielectric microwave filters on satellites that, based upon their light weight, enabled increased channel capacity and/or fuel storage on the satellites.
  • Successfully defended Berwick Industries in a patent infringement proceeding brought by 3M regarding gift-package bows that are shipped in flat packages to avoid damage and blossom into perfect bows on arrival when their strings are pulled (In re Pull-String Bows).
  • Prepared a 337 complaint for a company owning a food-related patent, which was instrumental in resolving the dispute before an investigation was declared (resolution involved the sale of a product division to the accused infringer).
  • Represented a European chemical company that was accused of infringing multiple patents and misappropriating trade secrets relating to plastic food casings; presented antitrust defenses; and subsequently settled the case on a favorable basis.
  • Represented a Japanese semiconductor company accused of importing infringing memory devices. After investigation, the complaint was dismissed and refiled as a patent infringement case in U.S. District Court, where our client prevailed on the basis of an antitrust defense.
  • Represented respondents accused of infringing design patents covering aspects of the Ford F-150. Resulted in the introduction of the Access To Repair Parts Act (H.R. 3059), which sought to exempt repaired components from design patent infringement. In the Matter of Certain Automotive Parts.
  • Represented two respondents through trial in defending against allegations of patent infringement relating to three patents covering computer forensic devices. Prevailed on an Initial Determination finding no domestic industry. In the Matter of Certain Computer Forensic Devices and Products.
  • Represented complainant in a patent infringement action relating to baby strollers and playards. Case settled favorably while summary determination motions were pending. In the Matter of Certain Strollers and Playards.
  • Represented complainant as lead counsel in a USITC patent infringement action relating to handheld underground cable and pipe locators. The parties reached a global settlement during the investigation. In the Matter of Certain Underground Cable and Pipe Locators.

Contact Us

A. Neal Seth
202.719.4179 | nseth@wiley.law

Related Practice Areas

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletins

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletins

Our Patent Practice publishes Federal Circuit Patent Bulletins, which provide selected excerpts of precedential patent law decisions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. To sign up to receive these updates, click here

For any questions about the Bulletins, please contact Lawrence M. Sung or A. Neal Seth.

2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Regeneron Pharm., Inc. v. Merus B.V.
July 28, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Soft Gel Techs, Inc. v. Jarrow Formulas, Inc.
July 26, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Millennium Pharm., Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
July 18, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: IPCom GmbH & Co. v. HTC Corp.
July 11, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Corp.
July 11, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: AdjustaCam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc.
July 5, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong
June 29, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal
June 27, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Storer v. Clark
June 22, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Outdry Techs. Corp. v. Geox S.p.A.
June 20, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: NexLearn, LLC v. Allen Interactions, Inc.
June 20, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: One-E-Way, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
June 19, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: EmeraChem Holdings, LLC v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc.
June 19, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Cleveland Clinic Found. v. True Health Diagnostics, LLCA.
June 19, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Servs.
June 12, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
June 12, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: New World Int’l, Inc. v. Ford Global Techs., LLC
June 9, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Prot. Servs.
June 8, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Skky Inc. v. MindGeek, s.a.r.l.
June 8, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Checkpoint Sys., Inc. v. All-Tag Security S.A.A.
June 7, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Evans v. Building Materials Corp. of Am.
June 7, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Preston v. Nagel
June 1, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Impression Prods., Inc. v. Lexmark Int’l, Inc.
May 30, 2017 

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.
May 30, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Rivera v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
May 24, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC
May 22, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Mylan Institutional LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
May 22, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ArcelorMittal v. AK Steel Corp.
May 17, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Cisco Sys., Inc. v. Cirrex Sys., Inc.
May 15, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re AT&T Intellectual Prop. II, L.P.
May 15, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Nova Chems. Corp. v. Dow Chem. Co.
May 15, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
May 15, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Rovalma, S.A. v. Böhler-Edelstahl GmbH & Co. KG
May 15, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC
May 8, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.
May 2, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Nichia Corp. v. Everlight Elecs. Co.
May 2, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co.
May 2, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Life Techs. Corp. v. Promega
February 23, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Van Os
January 3, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Ethicon, Inc.
January 3, 2017

2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Van Os
January 3, 2017

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.
October 3, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Lyda v. CBS Corp.
October 3, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Drone Techs., Inc. v. Parrot S.A.
October 3, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Husky Injection Molding Sys. Ltd. v. Athena Automation Ltd.
September 26, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Amazon.com Inc.
September 26, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. DirecTV, LLC
September 26, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Cox Commc’ns, Inc. v. Sprint Commc’n Co.
September 26, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp.
September 22, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ClassCo, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
September 22, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Yeda Research & Dev. Co. v. Abbott GmbH & Co. KG
September 20, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: LifeNet Health v. LifeCell Corp.
September 16, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp.
September 16, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games Am., Inc.
September 13, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.
September 12, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Dynamic 3D Geosolutions LLC v. Schlumberger Ltd.
September 12, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Asia Vital Components Co. v. Asetek Danmark A/S
September 8, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: UCB, Inc. v. Yeda Research & Dev. Co.
September 8, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ScriptPro, LLC v. Innovation Assocs., Inc.
August 15, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Vapor Point LLC v. Moorhead
August 10, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc.
August 10, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
August 9, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re CSB-Sys. Int’l, Inc.
August 9, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.
August 5, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Wi-LAN USA, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
August 1, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Murata Mach. USA v. Daifuku Co.
August 1, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: GPNE Corp. v. Apple Inc.
August 1, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Elec. Power Grp., LLC v. Alstom S.A.
August 1, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Advanced Ground Info. Sys., Inc. v. Life360, Inc.
July 28, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.
July 26, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Magnum Oil Tools Int’l, Ltd.
July 25, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc.
July 22, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Polar Electro Oy v. Suunto Oy
July 20, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: WBIP, LLC v. Kohler Co.
July 19, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: SkyHawke Techs., Inc. v. Deca Int’l Corp.
July 18, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: The Medicines Co. v. Hospira, Inc.
July 11, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Rapid Litig. Mgmt. Ltd. v. CellzDirect, Inc.
July 5, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
July 5, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: BASCOM Global Internet Servs., Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
June 27, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp.
June 21, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: SAS Institute, Inc. v. ComplementSoft, LLC
June 10, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Indacon, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.
June 6, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc.
June 3, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ruckus Wireless, Inc. v. Innovative Wireless Solutions
May 31, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Profectus Tech. LLC v. Huawei Techs. Co.
May 27, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Aqua Prods., Inc.
May 25, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Diamond Coating Techs., LLC v. Hyundai Motor Am.
May 17, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re TLI Commc’ns LLC Patent Litig.
May 17, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Intendis GmbH v. Glenmark Pharm. Ltd.
May 16, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Merck & Cie v. Watson Labs., Inc.
May 13, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.
May 12, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
May 12, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd.
May 9, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Queen’s Univ. at Kingston
March 7, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Synopsys, Inc. v. Lee
February 10, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Sys. Inc.
February 9, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: TriVascular, Inc. v. Samuels
February 8, 2016

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: TriReme Med., LLC v. AngioScore, Inc.
February 8, 2016

2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.
December 17, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Imaginal Systematic, LLC v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.
November 12, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. Roxane Labs., Inc.
November 12, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
November 11, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Momenta Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA Inc.
November 11, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLC
November 5, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Atlas IP, LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.
October 29, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Atlas IP, LLC v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
October 29, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Achates Reference Publ’g, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
September 30, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Nordock, Inc. v. Sys., Inc.
September 29, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Vermont v. MPHJ Tech. Invs., LLC
September 28, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Inline Plastics Corp. v. EasyPak, LLC
August 27, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.
August 17, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Suprema, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
August 12, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Carnegie Mellon Univ. v. Marvell Tech. Grp., Ltd.
August 4, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
August 4, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
July 21, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Daiichi Sankyo Co. v. Lee
July 6, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: The Medicines Co. v. Hospira, Inc.
July 6, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: WesternGeco L.L.C. v. ION Geophysical Corp.
July 6, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: SpeedTrack, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.
June 30, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Gaymar Indus., Inc. v. Cincinnati Sub-Zero Prods., Inc.
June 26, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Mohsenzadeh v. Lee
June 26, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp.
June 25, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: G.D. Searle LLC v. Lupin Pharms., Inc.
June 25, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Internet Patents Corp. v. Active Network, Inc.
June 25, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Kimble v. Marvel Entm’t, LLC
June 22, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ePlus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.
June 19, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
June 19, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc.
June 17, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: GTNX, Inc. v. INTTRA, Inc.
June 17, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC
June 17, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.
June 15, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Kaneka Corp. v. Xiamen Kingdomway Grp. Co.
June 11, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: OIP Techs., Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
June 11, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Alps South, LLC v. The Ohio Willow Wood Co.
June 5, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Shire Dev., LLC v. Watson Pharms., Inc.
June 4, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc.
May 26, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.
May 18, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Lelo Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
May 15, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. Elan Pharms., Inc.
May 15, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ArcelorMittal France v. AK Steel Corp.
May 15, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Biogen MA, Inc. v. Japanese Found. for Cancer Research
May 8, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: EON Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
May 7, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Takeda Pharms. U.S.A., Inc. v. West-Ward Pharm. Corp.
May 7, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Sukumar v. Nautilus, Inc.
May 4, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Info-Hold, Inc. v. Applied Media Techs. Corp.
April 27, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Info-Hold, Inc. v. Muzak LLC
April 27, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.
April 27, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ineos USA LLC v. Berry Plastics Corp.
April 16, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Automated Merch. Sys., Inc. v. Lee
April 10, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Oplus Techs., Ltd. v. Vizio, Inc.
April 10, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Insite Vision, Inc. v. Sandoz
April 9, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
April 6, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. MicroStrategy Inc.
April 6, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Apotex Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
March 31, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Cadence Pharm., Inc. v. Exela PharmSci Inc.
March 25, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.
March 25, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Kennametal, Inc., v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co.
March 25, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Senju Pharm. Co. v. Lupin Ltd.
March 20, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Two-Way Media LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
March 19, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.
March 17, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.
March 16, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Eidos Display, LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.
March 11, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Gilead Scis., Inc., v. Lee
February 27, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Pacing Techs., LLC v. Garmin Int'l, Inc.
February 19, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Cellco P’ship
February 12, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Soverain Software LLC v. Victoria’s Secret Direct Brand Mgmt., LLC
February 12, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. New York Times Co.
February 10, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC
February 4, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litig.
February 2, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Imes
January 30, 2015

Supreme Court: Trademark Tacking Is a Question of Fact to Be Decided by a Jury
January 22, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
January 20, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: NeuroRepair, Inc. v. Nath Law Grp.
January 15, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Assocs., Inc.
January 13, 2015

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Delano Farms Co. v. Cal. Table Grape Comm’n
January 9, 2015

2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Fleming v. Escort Inc.
December 29, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n
December 23, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Aqua Shield v. Inter Pool Cover Team
December 22, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.
December 19, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Univ. of Utah Research Found. v. Ambry Genetics Corp.
December 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ABB Turbo Sys. AG v. TurboUSA, Inc.
December 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp.
December 15, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Japanese Found. for Cancer Research v. Lee
December 10, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P.
December 8, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
December 8, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.
December 8, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Sys., Inc.
December 4, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Tyco Healthcare Grp. LP v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
December 4, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Par Pharm., Inc. v. TWi Pharm., Inc.
December 3, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.
November 20, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: e.Digital Corp. v. Futurewei Techs., Inc.
November 19, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Medac Pharma, Inc.
November 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC
November 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Azure Networks, LLC v. CSR PLC
November 6, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC
November 5, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.
October 22, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: IRIS Corp. v. Japan Airlines Corp.
October 21, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: AntiCancer, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.
October 20, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: World Class Tech. Corp. v. Ormco Corp.
October 20, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: CardSoft, LLC v. VeriFone, Inc.
October 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Robert Bosch LLC v. Snap-On, Inc.
October 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: SSL Servs., LLC v. Citrix Sys., Inc.
October 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: EMD Millipore Corp. v. AllPure Techs., Inc.
September 30, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Am. Calcar, Inc. v. Am. Honda Motor Co.
September 29, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Benefit Funding Sys. LLC v. Advance Am. Cash Advance Centers Inc.
September 25, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: uPI Semiconductor Corp. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
September 25, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: SCA Hygiene Prods. AB v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC
September 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: VirnetX, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.
September 16, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Interval Licensing, LLC v. AOL, Inc.
September 10, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Scientific Plastic Prods., Inc. v. Biotage AB
September 10, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: EPOS Techs. Ltd. v. Pegasus Techs. Ltd.
September 5, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: buySAFE, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
September 3, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Mformation Techs., Inc. v. Research in Motion Ltd.
August 22, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ferring B.V. v. Watson Labs., Inc.
August 22, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ferring B.V. v. Watson Labs., Inc.
August 22, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: AbbVie, Inc. v. Mathilda & Terrance Kennedy Inst. of Rheumatology Trust
August 21, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Apotex, Inc. v. UCB, Inc.
August 15, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: ScriptPro LLC v. Innovation Assocs., Inc.
August 7, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Tyco Healthcare Grp. LP v. Mutual Pharm. Co.
August 7, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Align Tech., Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
July 21, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Arlington Indus., Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
July 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Digitech Image Techs., LLC v. Elecs. for Imaging, Inc.
July 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Troy v. Samson Mfg. Corp.
July 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: H-W Tech., LC v. Overstock.com. Inc.
July 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Golden Bridge Tech., Inc. v. Apple Inc.
July 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Medisim Ltd. v. BestMed LLC
July 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc.
July 10, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Stauffer v. Brooks Bros., Inc.
July 10, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.
July 7, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
July 7, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: MadStad Eng’g, Inc. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
July 1, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.
July 1, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Hill-Rom Servs., Inc. v. Stryker Corp.
June 27, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Nintendo of Am., Inc.
June 25, 2014

Supreme Court Sides with Broadcasters, Holding that Aereo Internet TV Service Infringes Public Performance Copyright Rights
June 25, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: CEATS, Inc. v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
June 24, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo!
June 20, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Gemalto S.A. v. HTC Corp.
June 19, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.
June 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Dinsmore
June 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.
June 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Triton Tech of Texas, LLC v. Nintendo of Am., Inc.
June 17, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Source Vagabond Sys. Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc.
June 16, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: STC.UNM v. Intel Corp.
June 16, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Q.I. Press Controls, B.V. v. Lee
June 16, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Krauser v. BioHorizons, Inc.
June 5, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Rambus, Inc.
June 5, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Consumer Watchdog v. Wisc. Alumni Research Found.
June 5, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Suffolk Techs., LLC v. AOL Inc.
May 29, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Wear Techs., LLC
May 29, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Tobinick v. Olmarker
May 19, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: InTouch Techs., Inc. v. VGo Commc’n, Inc.
May 9, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Monsanto Co. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
May 9, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Roslin Inst.
May 8, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Gen. Elec. Co. v. Wilkins
May 8, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Packard
May 6, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: GE Lighting Solutions, LLC. v. AgiLight, Inc.
May 1, 2014

Supreme Court Reshapes Fee Shifting in Patent Infringement Cases
April 29, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
April 28, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Vaillancourt v. Becton Dickinson & Co.
April 25, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Gilead Scis., Inc. v. Natco Pharma Ltd.
April 22, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Braintree Labs., Inc. v. Novel Labs.
April 22, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Glenmark Pharms. Inc., USA
April 21, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: DSM Desotech, Inc. v. 3D Sys. Corp.
April 18, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
April 11, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Trebro Mfg., Inc. v. FireFly Equip., LLC
April 9, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Chicago Bd. Options Exch., Inc. v. Int’l Sec. Exch., LLC
April 7, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Teles AG
April 4, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Microsoft Corp. v. DataTern, Inc.
April 4, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: In re Toyota Motor Corp.
April 3, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: MRC Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLP
April 2, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Endo Pharms. Inc. v. Actavis, Inc.
March 31, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Senju Pharm. Co. v. Apotex Inc.
March 31, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Shire Dev. LLC v. Watson Pharm., Inc.
March 28, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: StoneEagle Servs., Inc. v. Gillman
March 26, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Brain Life, LLC v. Elekta Inc.
March 24, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Energy Recovery, Inc. v. Hauge
March 20, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Alcon Res. Ltd. v. Barr Labs, Inc.
March 18, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Vederi, LLC v. Google, Inc.
March 14, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.
March 12, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Danisco US Inc. v. Novozymes A/S
March 11, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ancora Techs., Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
March 4, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Starhome GmbH v. AT&T Mobility LLC
February 25, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Elcommerce.com, Inc. v. SAP AG
February 25, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Frans Nooren Afdichtingssytemen B.V. v. Stopaq Amcorr Inc.
February 24, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Banner Pharmacaps, Inc.
February 24, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp.
February 21, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Takeda Pharm. Co. v. Zydus Pharms. USA Inc.
February 20, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Ring & Pinion Serv. Inc. v. ARB Corp.
February 19, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Butamax™ Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo, Inc.
February 18, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Solvay S.A., v. Honeywell Int’l Inc.
February 12, 2014

Federal Circuit Patent Bulletin: Tempo Lighting, Inc. v. Tivoli, LLC
February 10, 2014

View all practice area professionals >

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions, and Cookies Policy.