Recovery of Attorney Fees

San Francisco, CA
March 12, 2015

Two decisions - Highmark v. Allcare and Octane Fitness v. Icon Health and Fitness - have given trial courts more discretion to award attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and made it more difficult for reviewing courts to disturb a trial court's discretion. Lower courts are also broadening recovery opportunities.

Also discussed during this first portion of the conference will be Innovative Biometric Technology, LLC v. Toshiba (recovery under Rule 41(a)(2), 35 U.S.C. § 285, Rule 56 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927); Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Blackberry Ltd. (third-party Netflix recovers for bad faith subpoena enforcement under Rule 45(d)(1)); Medtrica Solutions Ltd. v. Cyagnus Medical LLC (on reconsideration, district court reversed its pre-Highmark denial of attorney fees in light of lower threshold set by Supreme Court); Lee v. Mike's Novelties, Inc. (in a post-Highmark ruling district could would not award attorney's fees despite litigation misconduct and willful infringement).

Read Time: 1 min
Jump to top of page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.