Alert

Billing Activities Are Not Professional Services

May 5, 2014

An Oregon federal court has held that allegations of wrongful billing practices do not constitute wrongful acts under a business liability policy because billing activities are not professional services.  Bennett v. U.S. Liab. Ins. Grp., 2014 WL 1660654 (D. Or. Apr. 25, 2014).

The policyholder was sued for inappropriate billing and fee collection practices and sought coverage under a business liability policy.  The insurer denied coverage on the basis that the complaint did not allege conduct within the policy’s definition of “Wrongful Act” because the lawsuit did not concern the rendering of “Professional Services,” which are defined as “services rendered to others for a fee solely in the conduct of the Insured’s profession . . . .”  The policy also limited coverage “to claims arising ‘solely in the performance of Professional Services as a Training Specialist/Seminar Conductor for others for a fee.’” 

The court agreed with the insurer, finding that neither the policy’s definition of “Professional Services” nor its specific definition of the policyholder’s professional services as “Training Specialist/Seminar Conductor for others for a fee . . . encompass[ed] the inappropriate billing actions alleged in [the] underlying lawsuit.”  Specifically, the court rejected the policyholder’s argument that because the policy’s definition of her professional services expressly included the phrase “for a fee” that the parties intended the policy to cover billing and fee disputes.  Instead, it determined that “for a fee” added nothing to the definition of “Professional Service” but “merely modifie[d] the type of ‘Training Specialist/Seminar Conductor’ services that are covered by the policy.”  The court noted that persuasive authority supported “its conclusion that ‘professional services’ do not include billing actions.”  The court also rejected the policyholder’s argument that the policy’s incorporation of exclusions relating to billing disputes implied coverage for billing activities because the lawsuit has to trigger the policy’s insuring agreement before the exclusions have any application.

The opinion is available here.

Read Time: 2 min
Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek