Alert

Professional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage for Insured Entity's Vicarious Liability

April 4, 2011

A New Jersey appellate court has held that a professional services exclusion in a medical center’s professional liability insurance policy precluded coverage for the center’s vicarious liability for the negligence of its doctor.  Valentin-Rivera v. New Jersey Property-Liability Insurance Guaranty Ass’n, 2011 WL 1085559 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Mar. 25, 2011).  The court also held that the state insurance guaranty association was not estopped from denying coverage where the insolvent insurer that issued the policy had failed to reserve its rights or disclaim coverage.

In the underlying suit, the plaintiff alleged that a doctor at the medical center had committed malpractice and that the medical center was vicariously liable under a theory of respondeat superior.  Both the doctor and the medical center sought coverage under the policy, and the insurer began providing a defense.  After the insurer was declared insolvent, the guaranty association settled the malpractice claim against the doctor but refused to pay the claim against the medical center because it believed the professional services exclusion barred coverage.  The guaranty association and the plaintiff then entered into a settlement in which they agreed to litigate the coverage dispute which, should the plaintiff prevail, would require the guaranty association to pay the plaintiff an additional sum.  In the declaratory judgment action that ensued, the trial court granted summary judgment to the insurer, and the plaintiff appealed.

On appeal, the court considered whether the professional services exclusion barred coverage for the medical center’s vicarious liability.  The policy’s insuring agreement for the entity afforded the medical center coverage for “[i]njury arising out of the rendering of or failure to render, . . . professional services by any person for whose acts or omission the [medical center] is legally responsible.”  However, the professional services exclusion barred entity coverage for the medical center “with respect to injury arising solely out of the acts or omissions in the rendering or failure to render professional services by individual physicians or nurse anesthetists, or by any paramedical for whom a premium charge is shown on the declarations page.”  The court held that the plain intent of the exclusion was to provide coverage for the medical center’s vicarious liability arising out of the activities of its staff, except for those staff specifically omitted by the exclusion.  In so holding, the court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the coverage was illusory because “professional services” could only be provided by a “medical professional,” a term not used in the policy.  Instead, the court concluded that the definition of “professional services” applied broadly to any person who was “rendering services ‘in the practice of the profession’ and (2) the services require ‘specialized knowledge and mental skill.’”  The court thus held that the entity coverage was broader than the exclusion and therefore not illusory.

The court also rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the guaranty association should be estopped from asserting coverage defenses because the insurer failed to timely reserve its rights or disclaim coverage.  In doing so, the court first noted that the guaranty association’s enabling statute granted it immunity from liability due to its actions.  The court then reasoned that, because the guaranty association could not be estopped from asserting its rights under the policy, even if it acted in bad faith while doing so, there was no reason why the insurer’s failure to reserve rights should estop the guaranty association either.

Read Time: 3 min
Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek