Newsletter

Citizens United, Free Speech and the Tax Man

May 2010

In its Citizens United decision, the Supreme Court of the United States opened up a new avenue for expression of political ideas by corporations and trade associations. Such entities may now use Treasury funds to run advertisements that expressly advocate the election or defeat of a candidate. Such freedom is not free, however, for the Internal Revenue Code and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) exact a cost on corporations and other entities engaging in such free expression.

First, corporations may not deduct as usual and normal business expenses their expenditures for express advocacy. Thus, like lobbying expenses, corporations effectively take a 35% hit on each dollar that they expend for political advocacy. As a result, not only is the cost of advertisements or communications a hit to the bottom line, the fact that the expenses are not deductible makes that hit even bigger.

Second, 501(c) organizations (other than 501(c)(3) charities, which may not engage in express advocacy) are subject to "527 tax" liability for expenses they incur with respect to political advocacy. The tax is the 35% corporate tax rate and would otherwise transform all political costs into 135% of the costs of the communications, etc., if it were not for a particular provision that applies the tax only on the lesser of the political expenditures (called "exempt function" expenditures in IRS-speak) or the aggregate investment income for the organization for that year. Even with the tax, the 501(c) organization must ensure that political activity does not become its primary purpose, or else it risks losing its tax exemption.

Finally, contributions to 527 political organizations that engage in independent expenditures are treated by the IRS in the same ways as described above for direct expenditures for independent communications. The contributions are not deductible and may trigger the 527(f) tax for 501(c) organizations.

In sum, freedom isn't free, even when it is permitted by the Supreme Court.

Read Time: 2 min
Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek