Newsletter

N.D. Ill. Refuses to Dismiss Rescission Action under Burford Abstention Doctrine but Stays Case

March/April 2002

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has refused to abstain from hearing an insurance rescission action simply because an Illinois liquidation proceeding was pending against the insured. QBE Int'l Ins. Ltd. v. Shapo, No. 01-C-0508, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3298 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 26, 2002). The district court did stay the action, however, under its discretionary powers until the completion of the liquidation proceedings.

The insured in this action was a trust comprised of employers who united to provide workers' compensation, occupational disease, and employer's liability insurance. The insurer provided errors and omissions coverage for the trustees of the insurance plan. In late 1999, the Illinois insurance commissioner filed a complaint for conservation against the insured, and the court entered a liquidation order that enjoined the prosecution of claims against the insured, its property, or the commissioner. Thereafter, the commissioner sued the trustees for breach of fiduciary duties and negligence in Illinois state court. The insurer denied coverage for the claim and filed this action to rescind the errors and omissions policy. The commissioner moved to dismiss the rescission action based on the Burford abstention doctrine.

The district court held that the Burford abstention doctrine did not apply because the rescission action was a simple contract action that did not interfere with Illinois's liquidation proceedings. The court observed that Burford abstention is "an extraordinary and narrow exception to the duty of a District Court to adjudicate a controversy properly before it." Thus, a district court should only abstain in "exceptional circumstances" where the exercise of federal jurisdiction will frustrate a complex state administrative proceeding. The court, however, did decide to exercise its inherent discretionary power to enjoin the action until the conclusion of the liquidation proceeding.

Read Time: 1 min
Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek